Peter singer speciesism and the equality of animals essay

Peter singer pdf

First, animals were used for food, their skins were used for clothing and shelter, and their bones for tools The use of language was another boundary line - but now chimpanzees and gorillas have learnt the sign language of the deaf and dumb, and there is evidence that whales and dolphins have a complex language of their own. As a result, a vast amount of suffering would be avoided. But there must be some kind of blow - I don't know exactly what it would be, but perhaps a blow with a heavy stick - that would cause the horse as much pain as we cause a baby by slapping it with our hand. Is his argument successful. How can we have rights for "brutes? Singer talks about the harsh treatments of these farm animals and the factory farming that goes on behind the scenes It can be argued that this is just an expansion of the hardship of human equality, and just as we were once desensitized to others race or gender, we are now doing the same to animals. In assessing this conception of ethics we should distinguish between explanations of the origin of ethical judgments, and justifications of these judgments. He then argues against accepting such a principle, on the grounds that it would make it illegitimate to give more weight to undeserved suffering than to deserved suffering. Animals have played a role in society since evolution began. A wild animal cannot distinguish an attempt to overpower and confine from an attempt to kill; the one causes as much terror as the other. The extent to which they are racist will vary, and it would take detailed evidence and analysis to demonstrate that each of these sectors, and each of its divisions and subdivisions, involves or expresses racist practices. A stone does not have interests because it cannot suffer.

This is why the limit of sentience using the term as a convenient, if not strictly accurate, shorthand for the capacity to suffer or experience enjoyment or happiness is the only defensible boundary of concern for the interests of others.

No matter how self-interested the origins of ethics may be, it is possible that once we have started thinking ethically we are led beyond these mundane premises.

Therefore, in the story of Mad Max, the moral distinction than can be drawn is unjustified for numerous reasons Animals are in every aspect of our lives in how they are utilized to make our lives easier, to sustain us, or as a pet.

An unprejudiced moralist taking a universal point of view would agree with this judgment.

What is the third form of speciesism, according to singer?

So, with the exception of animals raised entirely on grazing land unsuitable for crops, animals are eaten neither for health, nor to increase our food supply. What most do not think about is where their burgers or chicken wings are really coming from. That a being does not use language or make tools is hardly a reason for ignoring its suffering. In other words I shall suggest that, having accepted the principle of equality as a sound moral basis for relations with others of our own species, we are also committed to accepting it as a sound moral basis for relations with those outside our own species - the nonhuman animals. If they had only been contractualists, the slave traders could have rebutted the abolitionists by explaining to them that ethics stops at the boundaries of the community, and since blacks are not part of their community they have no duties to them. When the fish was cut open, it was found to have a smaller fish in its stomach. The trouble is the vast diversity of how people see humans and animals and how they are different and yet the same. Then it was observed that the Galapagos woodpecker used a cactus thorn to dig insects out of crevices in trees. Singer cautions against taking such a stance of equality of fact. The early European settlers regarded the indigenous people as an inferior race, living a miserable existence. Neither plants nor the car are conscious. Nor, for that matter, can comparisons of suffering between different be made precisely. Animals live dangerous lives in enclosures and cages, where they are forced to eat and sleep against their own will. If one is deciding who gets the job as pilot and the four people being considered are all capable pilots, then the principle of equality says that gender should not be a relevant criterion. We need to start eliminating.

Photo Peter SingerCredit P. This omission has been deliberate.

Peter singer animal liberation pdf

With speciesism, we are very far from reaching that point. Well, that's the trick that Singer and others don't really solve, though they work on it. Drug companies test new shampoos and cosmetics they are intending to market by dripping concentrated solutions of tl1em into the eyes of rabbits. Most of us cannot defend our diet in this way. If we do this then we are committed to deciding a matter of fact before the evidence is in, a very bad idea epistemologically, and, further, if a hard case of actual inequality were established, then our principle of equality would be shattered. Again, I would not criticise Kagan for not noticing this, but it is more surprising that he seems unaware that he is simply restating the view standardly put forward by proponents of a natural law ethic when defending their opposition to abortion and to euthanasia for profoundly intellectually disabled humans. Over the 40 years that have passed since the publication of Animal Liberation, there have been very few forthright defenders of speciesism. Singer says NO.

Echoes of it can be found in the ethical theories of contemporary philosophers like John Rawls, Gilbert Harman and John Mackie; and it has been used, by these philosophers and others, to justify the exclusion of animals from the sphere of ethics, or at least from its core.

The problem goes so deep — and is now often compounded, as we have been saying, with alcohol and petrol abuse, which in turn lead to domestic violence and serious health damage — that it is hard to know how the situation can be turned around. If we accept this we must reject the suggestion that when dealing with mentally defective humans we grant them the status or rights normal for their species.

Singer talks about the harsh treatments of these farm animals and the factory farming that goes on behind the scenes Native Americans and First Nations people in Alaska also have huge problems with alcoholism.

peter singer animal liberation summary
Rated 8/10 based on 10 review
Equality in Peter Singer´s All Animals are Equal Essay